Visit Islamabad and one finds a serene, green city laid out on a grid, to all intents and purposes just another boring capital city.
The truth of the matter while we were growing up there was that everything you can imagine happened - but it happened behind closed doors and was spoken about only in hushed tones.
On my most recent visit there I found the city changed. The flood of earthquake reconstruction money brings with it thousands of foreign aid workers whose primary need after work is for distraction and pleasure. They are the new elite.
Here in the US as a Pakistani-American I barely notice the color of my skin. In Islamabad, I realize that being American is limited to those who are white.
As Pakistan's capital, Islamabad has always been a city with foreigners but they generally stayed in their walled compounds and parties at the UN or American Clubs. Now they sit next to families at local restaurants, pulling out bottles of scotch or wine, puffing on cigarettes, getting red-faced and loud.
The waitstaff is obsequious and nobody tries to stop them, though it is illegal to drink alcohol in public or to smoke in restaurants. The older Pakistani patrons look either uncomfortable or pleased at how 'modern' Pakistan has become. The younger ones are noting carefully the behavior of their betters.
With their salaries and rent subsidies far above that of the local person, Islamabad's rents have skyrocketed. A one-bedroom apartment now goes for $1,500 - in cold hard American dollars only please - in a city where the average income is $270 a month.
A fairly wealthy family who lost their home in the earthquake cannot now afford to buy in the city, so look instead to developments two hours away. What, then, of the average family?
When the post-earthquake aid operations first arrived in late 2005, one team decided to go to a remote area to provide relief. Out there in the midst of utter destruction and destitution, they set up lavish furnished tents, a chef who provided caviar and other rare delicacies for them nightly, and teams whose youngest members (fresh out of undergraduate studies) worked for $4,000 a month right next to far more qualified senior Pakistani field technicians and development workers who were lucky if they got $500 for their pains.
My brother-in-law was told, by a man who claimed to be German intelligence, "Islamabad is one of the biggest party towns in the world - right after Ibiza and Goa, man. We love being posted here."
The tension is palpable in Musharraf's new open society too. Recently, six young Pakistani girls came forward and claimed to have been drugged and raped at a dance party. Today, female students broke into a brothel in the city to close it down. Seeing the photo of the students reminds me that two Pakistans live side by side, growing more wary of each other - the increasingly Westernized elite and the increasingly conservative everyone else.
As an American who has worked in international development, I have to ask: Why is the export of "freedom" all too often limited to excess, consumption of alcohol or drugs and the loss of even positive local traditions?
When we talk about "progressive values" why is the discussion limited to pre- or extra-marital sex, homosexuality or secularism?
What happened to the core progressive ideals of economic fairness, social justice, equal opportunity for all people, and good stewardship of nature? Why aren't we exporting or promoting those values?
I do not blame everything that is bad in Pakistan on foreigners. But I see that, similar to the flood of aid and weapons that came into Pakistan during the Afghan-Soviet conflict, money changes the balance of power and privilege in societies and that is occurring once again in Islamabad: strengthening a dictator's policies and forming a new elite of foreigners and Westernized Pakistanis.
While I believe that development work is vital, it is just as important to tread carefully and respectfully when visiting or trying to help a country. There are UN reports measuring many things, but none, to my knowledge, measure the often crushing impact that foreign aid workers and money have on local cultures, real estate, and economy.
As a Pakistani, I see that we rid ourselves of the colonialists six decades ago never dreaming we'd welcome them back in a new form to take on crippling debt, set up color lines all over again and swallow unquestioningly everything we're given in order to become modern and free - but never quite equal.
Wednesday, March 28, 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)











12 comments:
Wow! Thank you for making me aware of an aspect I have not heard before or, sadly, never really considered.
I've linked to this - you may think oddly - to my post on the madrassah news.
Asalaamu alaikum.
Thank you for this "on the ground" report. It is very educational. I agree with you that one real danger that comes from trying to "help" a country tends to be that we bring in the worst elements of Western culture and very little respect for the traditional culture or for truly progressive ideals of respect, economic security for all etc.
everytime i visit pakistan, i see the changes, the differences, the way things are now v. the way things were a decade or two or three ago. i'm already saying, in my crotchetiest voice, "in MY day . . . "
Thank you for your post. Very interesting and very sad.
Assalamualikum
Very intresting and informative ,sister..
thanks.
let it be heard aloud.
Ah! Inshallah I might be visiting Pakistan after nine years! Has it changed much? :)
i have said this to eteraz several times, but i am not sure anyone is listening: if this is what we are exporting as freedom, is it any wonder that a good bit of the muslim world has decided not to buy? i know i am underwhelmed by it.
good piece!
LoA.
As someone who actually lives in Islamabad, I can tell you that foreigners consuming alcohol in public restaurants is the least of our worries, and while real estate prices continue to rise, middle class and even many 'bourgeois' families have not really been able to afford housing in Islamabad for a very long time. This has more to do with overseas Pakistanis investing in Pakistan post 9/11 and less to do with the earthquake.
Much more worrying is the ever increasing economic stratification, the non-existant rule of law, and the uncontrolled spread of Islamofascism.
I don't think you know anything about what is "under the mask" - or rather what is being obscured by the filters of the American media - that is all that I think you bother to read.
I suggest you have a listen to their draft manifesto (you do speak Urdu, right?) - and write 'bout that... I don't agree with it all...and I know that there are aspects of all this that I do not like... but any critique, and any thought about what is supposedly "conservative" should be done after you have actually listened to them unfiltered.
Aside from some of the obvious concerns, they sound pretty much like Chavez does --- populist, with a social moral twist - but Chavez has his own christian social morality as well...
have a listen, then critique, and/or discuss the issues - not just react...
click here to listen to the lal masjid manifesto.
I thought long about your Islamabad post and at the end of it don't know how I feel about it. Foreign aid is needed when the occasion demands it, like the earthquake. In the end, I think it's the fault of the people in the city themselves if they are allowing themselves to be swayed into the materialism and "Western" ways, not because of foreign aid.
In Bangladesh the so-called elite ways and mannerisms are practiced more due to the army. I am sure Pakistani army (especially the top brass) are equally rich and "Western" (I once read somewhere of so-called key-parties and other decadence by top army officials). And in Pakistan, these are the people in power.
BBC had an article the other day about how people think Musharref's motorcade stopping the traffic is ok, shows he is doing something, and how one minister always dresses in the best suits because people in his village then point to him in pride as a powerful man "doing something". He once tried to dress in local garb to no avail.
Salaam and thank you for your comments!
Robyn: You're very welcome. :)
This is not in any way meant to be an exhaustive thesis on everything that is going on in Pakistan today - merely a snapshot of one aspect, namely the ripple effects of foreign aid and workers on a society. I'm glad you enjoyed it!
Koonj: Thank you dear.
Aaminah: Yes, I agree. I think the means are as important as the ends when it comes to development or aid.
Baj: Lol! I definitely feel that way too! :)
Safiya & UmmS: Thank you for reading!
Suroor: It has changed a lot - in many good ways too.
As someone who lived there for many years I think the first thing I notice when I visit is all the ways that it has changed for the worse - trees cut down, traffic, pollution.
It takes a few weeks for the positive changes to rise to the surface - the sense of pride that many people feel in being Pakistani now, the vigor of the youth, the slow cultural contextualization of many imported ideas, media and art.
LoA: Thanks, glad you enjoyed it. I think that it is underwhelming for us, but I have to admit that it can be exciting as well when introduced to societies that haven't had certain freedoms before. That's the draw that makes everyone rush headlong into the fray without much thought of the future - I only hope much of the indigenous heritage and wisdom is still around to be salvaged later.
MMI: "Much more worrying is the ever increasing economic stratification, the non-existent rule of law, and the uncontrolled spread of Islamofascism."
This piece was a look at the effects of foreign aid and workers on a society, it wasn't a comprehensive look at everything that is going on in Pakistan right now - which is why my mention of Musharraf, Pakistani elites and fundamentalists is restricted to one paragraph.
Islamabad has been unaffordable for many for a long time - and though I agree that expat Pakistanis have much to do with that, I maintain that foreign embassies and development agencies have contributed greatly too.
Thank you for your additions.
"Anonymous": *sigh* Why is it always the commenters who use the anonymous handle the ones who feel free to be obnoxious?
"I don't think you know anything about what is "under the mask"
etc., etc.
a) Your link doesn't work.
b) Any group that threatens suicide bombings is radical in my books.
c) Had you actually bothered to read this entry, you'd know that it is about foreign development and the export of certain ideals under the guise of that development - not an attack on your Lal Masjid folk.
d) lastly, had you couched your comment in more polite terms I'm sure its benefit would have been greater.
Mezba: I agree that the situation is broader than I articulated - the entry was meant to be a snapshot of one aspect of what is going on in Pakistan right now. Of course, there are other factors, including Pakistanis own elitism and racism, etc, as you said.
Foreign aid is not only a necessity for developing countries but it is the ethical responsibility of countries that are more developed to provide that aid.
The point of the entry was not that foreign aid or workers should be kicked out of the country.
It was merely to say that foreign aid and workers have cultural and economic effects on the countries that they enter and that the way that development is done - the manner that it is implemented - is as important as the work itself.
Warmly,
Baraka
Post a Comment